Website Builder
AI powered
Schedule a DEMO
Home /Blog /Should Restaurants Still Take Phone Orders? A Rush-Hour Cost Test

Should Restaurants Still Take Phone Orders? A Rush-Hour Cost Test

Bedros Agopian
Bedros AgopianContributor
BlogIndependent Restaurants
8 min read

Restaurants should keep taking phone orders when the calls bring in enough profitable sales to justify the labor and disruption behind them.

If restaurant phone orders keep pulling staff away from guests, food prep, packing, or other orders, measure whether they’re worth it. Don’t keep answering out of habit.

The Rush-Hour Cost Test is a simple way to do that. It’s a seven-day log of every call during your peak hours. At the end, you’ll know whether to keep the phone as it is, limit it, or send routine orders online.

Why Phone Orders Become Expensive During a Restaurant Rush

A phone order costs more than the minutes on the call. The higher cost is the work that stops while someone is on the phone.

A four-minute call at 6:45 on a Friday is four minutes when that person isn’t:

  • Taking the next counter order
  • Packing a delivery bag before the driver walks in
  • Working the line or the oven
  • Helping a guest
  • Watching incoming online and delivery orders

Then there’s the call itself. Large pie, half pepperoni, half mushroom, light sauce, well done. The caller changes their mind about the wings. You read it all back over the hood fans. Then you take a card number, or you take a name, and hope they show up.

That’s where most restaurant phone order mistakes come from. It’s rarely carelessness. It’s a loud room, a stack of modifiers, and one person doing two jobs. Each mistake becomes a remake, a refund, or a complaint.

Hold times cost you, too. Some callers on hold hang up and order somewhere else.

Why Restaurants Shouldn’t Just Turn the Phone Off

Turning off the phone isn’t right for every restaurant. For many independents, callers include some of their best customers.

Restaurant phone ordering still matters for:

  • Older or less tech-comfortable customers who would rather talk to a person
  • Large or complicated orders, like office lunches or party trays
  • Catering inquiries about dates, headcounts, and setup
  • Allergy and special-request questions that need a direct answer
  • Regulars who have called the same number for years
  • Customers who got stuck ordering online

Say your neighborhood Chinese restaurant has regulars who call every Thursday. Cutting the phone won’t send them to your website. It may send them down the street.

The goal is to get the phone doing the right work. It isn’t to force every customer online.

Run the Rush-Hour Cost Test

For seven days, log every call during your peak periods. Use a tally sheet by phone, or pull the numbers from your phone service’s call log and your POS. Track these nine things:

MetricWhat to record
Calls receivedTotal calls during peak periods
Calls answeredHow many staff actually pick up
Orders generatedCalls that become paid orders
Average call lengthApproximate minutes
Average ticketRevenue from phone orders
Labor involvedWho answers and approximate hourly wage
Errors/remakesMistakes connected to phone orders
Abandoned callsCallers who hang up or never order
Call typeRoutine repeat order, or one that needed a person (catering, allergy, complex order)

Log calls in 30-minute blocks. That shows you when the phone is busiest.

At the end of the week, work out your direct labor cost:

Phone-order labor cost = total call minutes ÷ 60 × employee hourly labor cost

Use what that employee actually costs you per hour, including payroll taxes, not just their base wage.

A Hypothetical Friday Dinner Rush

These numbers are made up to show how the math works. They are not industry benchmarks.

A pizzeria gets 26 calls between 5:30 and 7:30 p.m. Staff answer 20. Sixteen orders became paid. The average call runs four minutes. The average phone ticket is $34. The cashier who answers costs about $20 an hour.

  • Call time: 20 calls × 4 minutes = 80 minutes
  • Labor cost: 80 ÷ 60 × $20 = about $27
  • Phone sales: 16 orders × $34 = $544
  • Errors: 2 orders remade
  • Abandoned: 6 calls never answered

On paper, taking phone orders at a restaurant like this looks cheap. About $27 in labor brought in $544 in sales.

But the formula only counts direct costs. Those 80 minutes came out of the two busiest hours of the week. If the cashier also runs the counter, that’s 80 minutes of a line waiting and bags sitting. And six callers never got through. Some of them would have ordered.

That cost is harder to measure, so note it anyway. “Counter line of five” or “driver waited” next to a call tells you more than the formula can.

Keep, Limit, or Redirect Restaurant Phone Ordering?

Your log will point to one of three choices. This isn’t really a question of restaurant online ordering vs phone orders. It’s about which orders belong on which channel.

Keep phone ordering when calls consistently bring in valuable orders, and staff can handle them without hurting service. That’s often the case when most calls are catering, large orders, or regulars with questions.

Limit phone ordering when calls are useful but disruptive. For example:

  • Assign the phone to one person during peak hours
  • Take phone orders outside your busiest 30 to 60 minutes, and point callers online during that window
  • Ask for advance notice on large and catering orders

Redirect routine orders online; when most callers place simple orders, they could finish faster themselves. If the same regulars order the same combo every week, those orders don’t need a call.

Redirecting doesn’t mean hanging up on anyone. Keep the phone available for questions, accessibility needs, unusual requests, and larger orders.

Make Online Ordering Easier Before Asking Customers to Use It

If customers keep calling because your website is confusing, you don’t have a phone problem. You have an ordering problem.

Most advice on how to reduce restaurant phone calls starts with pushing customers online. Start by ordering from your own site on your phone. Then have someone who has never used it try. Check:

  • Is the Order Online button easy to spot?
  • Is the menu easy to read on a phone?
  • Are modifiers like size, toppings, and spice level easy to understand?
  • Are pickup and delivery options clear?
  • Can a customer finish an order in a couple of minutes?
  • Are prices and item availability accurate?

The last one matters more than it looks. If you have to call a customer to say an item is out, they’ll just call next time.

Once the site works, tell regulars with a line on the receipt or a card in the bag.

Where Orders.co Fits

Orders.co helps restaurants cut unnecessary phone work without cutting callers off.

Order consolidation brings POS, website, kiosk, virtual-brand, and integrated third-party delivery orders into one workflow. A direct online ordering website gives routine callers an easy way to order on their own. Menu management keeps prices and availability in sync across your POS, website, and delivery menus.

When a caller does need a person, staff can build the order in the POS and send an online payment link. The customer pays from their own device.

Thai Dish, an Orders.co customer, saw its phone call volume drop once more customers could order online.

The Bottom Line

Don’t decide on phone orders based on what other restaurants are doing. Measure one week of your own calls.

The answer should come from your order volume, your customers’ habits, your labor, and what your rush actually looks like. Put a tally sheet by the phone this week. By next week, you’ll have your own numbers.

Your Inbox, Your Rules!

Tailor your newsletter with the topics you're most interested in.

Preferred Content Type

Related Blogs